The wikipedia entry on twitter appears to be rather accurate. On the discussion boards, when ever an issue about the posted information is raised, the issue is dealt with link to evidence as to why the information previously posted is incorrect. The information posted is trustworthy and i would not hesitate to use it in a report.
Some of the information that is useful for the upcoming report is found in the sections of the wiki, 2.1: Privacy and security, 4: Prominent Users, and 5: Usage. In these sections information is given as to where Twitter had holes in its "tweets" security. In the other sections it refers to as who and how twitter services are used. Not to mention the description included in the first paragraph, which is detailed and explains exactly what twitter is
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment